Comments for The Dialogue https://www.thedialogue.org/ Leadership for the Americas Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:03:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 Comment on Puryear: Money does not guarantee a quality education by Puryear: El dinero no garantiza una educación de calidad | Blog de PREAL https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/10/puryear-money-does-not-guarantee-a-quality-education/#comment-62 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:17:31 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2921#comment-62 […] View in English […]

]]>
Comment on Early Childhood Development for Human Capital Development by Desarrollo de la Primera Infancia: El primer paso para el desarrollo sostenible del capital humano | Blog de PREAL https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/10/early-childhood-development-the-first-step-to-sustainable-human-capital-development/#comment-63 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:25:33 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2926#comment-63 […] View in English […]

]]>
Comment on Why does East Asia and the Pacific produce better education results than Latin America and the Caribbean? One possible explanation by Eduardo Velez Bustillo https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/why-does-east-asia-and-the-pacific-produce-better-education-results-than-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-one-possible-explanation/#comment-58 Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:57:08 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2758#comment-58 In reply to Michael.

Michael

Unfortunately not many people are looking at this issue. Please, find below some sources that may be of your interest. This refers specifically to teacher absenteeism:

Papers that highlight the problem:
Chaudhury, Nazmul, Jeffrey Hammer, Michael Kremer, Karthik Muralidharan, and F. Halsey Rogers. 2006. “Missing in Action: Teacher and Health Worker Absence in Developing Countries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 1: 91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526058

Kremer, Michael, Karthik Muralidharan, Nazmul Chaudhury, Jeffrey Hammer, and F. Halsey Rogers. 2005. “Teacher absence in India: A snapshot.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2-3): 658-67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.658/abstract

Some of the best RCT impact evaluations that look at effects of interventions on teacher absence:
Duflo, Hanna, and Ryan 2010: https://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mshum/gradio/duflo.pdf

Muralidharan, Karthik, and Venkatesh Sundararaman. Forthcoming. “Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India.” Journal of Political Economy. https://econ.ucsd.edu/~kamurali/papers/Published%20Articles/Teacher%20Performance%20Pay%20(Final%20Pre-Publication%20Version).pdf

Duflo, Esther, Pascaline Dupas, and Michael Kremer. 2012. “School Governance, Teacher Incentives, and Pupil-Teacher Ratios: Experimental Evidence from Kenyan Primary Schools.” NBER Working Paper 17939.
Papers discussing possible solutions/approaches:
Kremer, Michael, and Alaka Holla. 2009. “Improving Education in the Developing World: What Have We Learned from Randomized Evaluations?” Annual Review of Economics 1 1: 513-42.

Rogers, F. Halsey, and Emiliana Vegas. 2009. “No more cutting class ? reducing teacher absence and providing incentives for performance.” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series, 4847.

A guidance note we researchers from the World Bank wrote recently on carrying out teacher absence surveys: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTHDOFFICE/Resources/AbsenceBookletNoAnnex.pdf Note that the references section includes links to a lot of the relevant papers, including World Bank ESW that measures teacher absence using classroom observation.

Hope this will be useful.

]]>
Comment on Why does East Asia and the Pacific produce better education results than Latin America and the Caribbean? One possible explanation by Michael https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/why-does-east-asia-and-the-pacific-produce-better-education-results-than-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-one-possible-explanation/#comment-57 Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:39:08 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2758#comment-57 Thanks for posting. Who is looking at this issue currently?

]]>
Comment on The Winds of Change? Chicago Teachers Put Education Reform in Question by Michael https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/chicago-teachers-take-the-wind-from-reformers-sails/#comment-56 Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:18:05 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2722#comment-56 In reply to Joshua.

Hazard pay is an interesting notion here. I am, however, less inclined to think of it as hazard pay as per soldiers in war zones (whose lives are at risk and are separated from loved ones), but rather as Increasing pay for hard to staff / hard to teach districts, which could be justified politically and economically if such teachers were willing to submit to evaluations that show they are actually adding value where it is most needed — not just staffing the classroom.

One could, of course, then have a healthy debate about the best way to make this evaluation… (school vs. classroom level standardized tests, value-added indices, peer or student reviews, etc.).

Also, I didn’t read the blog post to suggest that teachers making three times as much as the average (poverty-level) local wage to be causal — just ironic.

]]>
Comment on The Winds of Change? Chicago Teachers Put Education Reform in Question by Joshua https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/chicago-teachers-take-the-wind-from-reformers-sails/#comment-55 Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:00:52 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2722#comment-55 The author’s suggestion that good Chicago teachers are overpaid at $76,000 BECAUSE their students live in poverty undermines his entire argument. Chicago’s poverty stricken schools are very challenging to work at: a world away from the quiet teaching jobs in clean, safe, tree-lined suburban schools. I’m not a teacher, but in my experience, no one is choosing the $76k teaching position in Chicago over the $55k teaching positions in places like Dublin, Ohio. After cost of living differences, these are comparable salaries. While I am sure there exist some saintly teachers who choose to work where the need is greatest, despite the minimal financial incentive, at current salaries, urban school districts are mostly stuck with teacher who cannot find jobs elsewhere. If we are going to move toward an education model that pays quality people for results while letting go of the dead wood, we are going to have to offer better salaries for the most challenging teaching jobs.

Soldiers in Afghanistan get hardship pay compared to their colleagues working in Pentagon offices. By Odell’s logic, maybe we should lower their salaries closer to the average income in Afghanistan.

]]>
Comment on The Winds of Change? Chicago Teachers Put Education Reform in Question by Michael https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/chicago-teachers-take-the-wind-from-reformers-sails/#comment-54 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:52:52 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2722#comment-54 nice work Scott. I also appreciated Rotherham’s / EduWonks’s analysis: https://www.eduwonk.com/2012/09/chicago-seven-7-early-takaways-from-the-chicago-teachers-strike.html

]]>
Comment on The Winds of Change? Chicago Teachers Put Education Reform in Question by Ryan https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/09/chicago-teachers-take-the-wind-from-reformers-sails/#comment-53 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:48:10 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2722#comment-53 You completely misrepresent the increase in DC test scores as being attributable to Rhee/Fenty’s pro-charter, merit-pay reforms by grouping them into a period of 2007 to 2011. The bulk of those improvements occurred either before Rhee assumed her post or before she actually did any restructuring/firing. When coupled with how dismal the overall results turn out to be, it gives a lot more credibility to the teachers in Chicago who are rightly firing something with questionable results at best. I am not a teacher, not a union member, but I went from welfare as a child to graduating from Stanford with honors because of amazing public school teachers in Chicago. Most of them are striking because (1) it is disrespectful to treat them as glorified babysitters who do little more than test prep, and (2) these reforms are ultimately not improving learning and indeed dilute critical thinking. It is also worth noting that the CPS average teacher salaries, while higher than the national average, are not higher than surrounding school systems. CPS loses a lot of good teachers to higher paying suburban districts, and it is important for the retention of good teachers that compensation is at least consistent.

]]>
Comment on Baby Steps to Evaluate Teachers’ Skills: The State of Teachers in Mexico, Part Two by Felipe Zapata https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2012/08/baby-steps-to-evaluate-teachers-skills-the-state-teachers-in-mexico-part-two/#comment-51 Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:29:35 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2643#comment-51 The vast majority of teaching jobs in Mexico continue to be assigned to existing teachers, inherited, sold or given away as political favors, with no test of candidates’ knowledge and skills.

I have lived in Mexico for 12 years now, even becoming a citizen. As your two posts on this matter point out, and I am only echoing, the education system here is abysmal.

But these tests, and other changes in the country, will improve things in time. But it’s going to take a long, long time, sadly. Teachers and their unions here are stunningly hidebound.

]]>
Comment on Interview with Jeff Puryear for Todos Pela Educação by Daniel Ofertas ML https://www.thedialogue.org/blogs/2009/06/interview-with-jeff-puryear-for-todos-pela-educacao/#comment-46 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:05:50 +0000 https://prealblog.org/?p=2307#comment-46 Very good congratulations.

]]>